Pyrrhonism and Buddhism
Several analyists of the similarities between Pyrrhonism and Buddhism have argued that
they are philosophically so similar that they should be considered elements of a common
philosophical movement. Georgios T . Halkias
has declared that Pyrrhonism even ought to
be considered a Buddhist tradition alongside Theravada, Mahayana, and Vajrayana, and that
it should be called "Yavanayana," combining the Sanskrit term for the Hellenistic Greeks - yavana -
with the term for "vehicle" or "tradition" - yana.
Two historical exchanges of ideas between Pyrrhonism and Buddhism are thought
to have happened in antiquity. The first exchange set in motion Pyrrho's creation of Pyrrhonism.
Pyrrho was originally a follower of
Democritus,
a contemporary of Socrates. Democritus and Socrates were each influenced by a different
set of prior thinkers. Socrates followed in the line that included
Anaximander,
Anaximenes,
Anaxagoras, and
Archelaus,
the last two of whom personally taught Socrates. Socrates in turn influenced
Aristippus,
Antisthenes,
Plato, and many others.
Democritus followed in the line that started with
Heraclitus, and includes
Xenophanes,
Parmenides, and
Zeno of Elea.
Democritus in turn influenced Epicurus,
Protagoras, and
Anaxarchus, who personally
taught Pyrrho. Democritus was widely traveled and is thought to have visited
Egypt, Ethiopia, and India. He is best remembered for claiming that everything
was composed of atoms. He wrote extensively not only on natural philosophy (i.e., science)
but also on moral philosophy. Unfortunately we have only fragments of his works.
Pyrrho had a life-changing event when he accompanied
Alexander the Great's
army to India as part of Alexander's retinue of philosophers. He spent about a
year and a half in India researching the local philosophies. On part of the return
trip to Greece he was accompanied by Kalanos,
an Indian philosopher, which allowed him to extend his study of Indian philosophy.
When Pyrrho returned to Greece he founded a philosophy based on his interpretation
of the Buddhist Three Marks of Existence
filtered through his prior adherence to Democritean philosophy.
How the second historical exchange happened is difficult to trace, but the
evidence that it happened is strong. We have several books from the Pyrrhonist philosopher
Sextus Empiricus,
written around 200 CE. These books appear to be mostly compilations of existing
Pyrrhonist arguments against the dogmas of the other Hellenistic schools of philosophy.
Writing around the same time as Sextus Empiricus was the Buddhist philosopher,
Nagarjuna, whose works contain
a couple hundred of the same arguments that Sextus Empiricus recorded. Unlike the
situation in Greek philosophy, in the context of Indian philosophy nearly all of
these arguments appear to have been novel. It seems exceedingly unlikely that
Nargarjuna could have come up with all of these arguments himself, and in fact
Nargarjuna attests that he did not. He said that they came from "hidden" books.
From this it would appear that Nagarguna obtained access to some Pyrrhonist books
that had been imported into India as part of the flourishing
trade between India and the Roman Empire.
Other Greek books were known to have made it to India. Hence, Pyrrhonism is a major
source for Buddhist Madhyamika philosophy.
|